House Democrats voted today against an attempt to override the governor’s veto of a lawsuit reform bill.
Governor Henry vetoed House Bill 2458 last week, claiming the bill is unconstitutional.
The bill would require a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit for professional negligence to attach to the petition an affidavit attesting that a “reasonable interpretation of the facts supports a finding that the acts or omissions of the defendant….constituted professional negligence.”
The affidavit must state that the plaintiff has consulted a qualified expert who has reviewed the available medical records and other facts, and that the qualified expert has provided a written opinion stating that the facts support a finding that the defendant was professionally negligent.
Rep. Colby Schwartz, author of the bill, called the legislation a meaningful step in reducing frivolous lawsuits in Oklahoma and criticized House Democrats for locking up on a bill that passed the Senate unanimously in its current form.
“The governor of Oklahoma does not get to decide if legislation is constitutional; that job is left to our court system,” said Schwartz, R-Yukon. “This bill would have cleared the courts of frivolous lawsuits to make way for those with legitimate cases, but instead House Democrats voted today to keep our court system clogged with expensive lawsuits without merit.”
This bill, unlike the narrowly tailored law struck down by the Supreme Court in 2006, includes all cases of professional negligence. The law previously deemed unconstitutional only included medical malpractice cases, which was too narrow under the state’s constitution.
In 2004, Gov. Brad Henry presented a lawsuit reform package that included a requirement of certificate of merit before proceeding with medical liability cases. In a press release the governor put out in January 2004, Henry said: “People shouldn’t have to hire an attorney and pay thousands of dollars to fight claims that have no merit. We must act decisively to eliminate frivolous lawsuits.”
Rep. Dan Sullivan, R-Tulsa, said he couldn’t agree more with the governor’s statement in 2004.
“But unfortunately, Gov. Henry has done nothing but reject every lawsuit reform measure we have sent to his desk since he made campaign promises to bring changes to our state’s tort system,” said Sullivan. “The governor has made it clear that as long as he is in office, he will reject any and all reasonable lawsuit reform measures sent his way.”
Labels: Brad Henry, Colby Schwartz, Dan Sullivan, Lawsuit Reform